Which type of evidence uses logical reasoning to connect a suspect to a crime?

Circumstantial evidence is the type of evidence that relies on logical reasoning to establish a connection between a suspect and a crime. Unlike direct evidence, which may involve eyewitness testimony or a confession, circumstantial evidence is indirect and requires inference. For example, if a suspect’s fingerprints are found at a crime scene, it directly ties them to the location. However, if someone saw the suspect near the area around the time of the crime but did not see the crime itself, that is circumstantial. It requires the investigator to piece together various elements of the case—such as motive, opportunity, and behavior—to build a case against the suspect. This form of evidence often plays a crucial role in legal contexts, as it can contribute to a narrative that justifies accusations based on the circumstances surrounding the crime rather than on direct observation.